Teh intarnets are kewl

So like, I like did this ISI search, yeah it's like google and stuff. Anyway so I like looked around and found that:

Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers "implicit" endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no "consensus."

LOL WTF w00t, like no scientists believe in teh 9£0b4£ w4rm1n9. They're all afraid to speak up 'cause Al Gore might come after them with a flame thrower.

Heh! Found that on the intarnets too!

Now Rush Limbaugh will have me on his show and my sitemeter will go like all crazy and shit. And to think, I didn't even have to read the actual papers to see if it even made sense for the authors to go all batshit alarmist on their data. Teh intarnets rawks!